2026-001/060-diagnosis/07-diagnosis-hypothese-1.md
Csaba Fabian 9fbc846409 Enrich Workstream B (steps 3.1–3.3): fix variants, populate bodies, enrich guidance
040-situationAssessment:
- Fix EPG guidance variant sky→amber, KPG principle variant amber→sky
- Populate KPG principle body with evidence-backed content
- Enrich methods guidance with detailed descriptions and inline refs
- Improve einleitung hint (note: first process step, no prior reference)
- Improve text hint (soziale Dimension) and footnote with book links
- Enrich guidance.md with principles, method tips, text structure, EPG checklist
- Fix typo 'erlutert' → 'erläutert' in EPG criteria
- Update quality check footnote with EPG source link

050-analysis:
- Fix EPG guidance variant sky→amber, KPG principle variant amber→sky
- Populate KPG principle body with 4-step analysis procedure + evidence
- Fix garbled text in forbidden-terms guidance box
- Improve all method/hypothesen hints with richer guidance + required standards
- Improve all footnotes with inline book links
- Fix typo 'enthlt' → 'enthält' in EPG criteria
- Enrich guidance.md with principles, method overview, hypothesis tips, EPG checklist
- Improve index.jsonc subtitle and overview

060-diagnosis:
- Fix EPG guidance variant sky→amber, KPG principle variant amber→sky
- Populate KPG principle body with 5-step theoretical case analysis + evidence
- Enrich allowed-terms guidance with Wirkungszusammenhänge explanation
- Add emoji to einleitung footnote, improve hint with theory examples
- Improve all theory/hypothesis/arbeitshypothese hints and footnotes
- Update fallthematik-display hint and footnote with evidence links
- Add footnote to quality check with EPG source
- Substantially enrich guidance.md: principles, 5-step procedure, theory list,
  hypothesis tips, kooperatives Fallverstehen, full EPG checklist
- Improve index.jsonc subtitle and overview
2026-03-06 18:52:31 +00:00

618 B

id type title hint footnote
diagnosis-hypothese-1 markdown Erklärende Hypothese(n) (Theorie 1) Formulierung als erklärende Weil-Hypothese: «Weil [Theoriebezug], [Auswirkung auf Fallthematik].» Die Hypothesen müssen nachvollziehbar aus den theoretischen Ausführungen abgeleitet sein und Bezug zur Fallthematik haben. Bespreche die Hypothesen mit dem Klient*innensystem und prüfe, ob sie als hilfreich beurteilt werden. 📚 Erklärende Hypothesen ([Hochuli Freund/Stotz 2021, S. 253](/book/arbeit/253)) — Weil-Hypothesen als Kernstück der Diagnose ([Praxis, S. 113](/book/praxis/113))