Csaba Fabian
9fbc846409
040-situationAssessment: - Fix EPG guidance variant sky→amber, KPG principle variant amber→sky - Populate KPG principle body with evidence-backed content - Enrich methods guidance with detailed descriptions and inline refs - Improve einleitung hint (note: first process step, no prior reference) - Improve text hint (soziale Dimension) and footnote with book links - Enrich guidance.md with principles, method tips, text structure, EPG checklist - Fix typo 'erlutert' → 'erläutert' in EPG criteria - Update quality check footnote with EPG source link 050-analysis: - Fix EPG guidance variant sky→amber, KPG principle variant amber→sky - Populate KPG principle body with 4-step analysis procedure + evidence - Fix garbled text in forbidden-terms guidance box - Improve all method/hypothesen hints with richer guidance + required standards - Improve all footnotes with inline book links - Fix typo 'enthlt' → 'enthält' in EPG criteria - Enrich guidance.md with principles, method overview, hypothesis tips, EPG checklist - Improve index.jsonc subtitle and overview 060-diagnosis: - Fix EPG guidance variant sky→amber, KPG principle variant amber→sky - Populate KPG principle body with 5-step theoretical case analysis + evidence - Enrich allowed-terms guidance with Wirkungszusammenhänge explanation - Add emoji to einleitung footnote, improve hint with theory examples - Improve all theory/hypothesis/arbeitshypothese hints and footnotes - Update fallthematik-display hint and footnote with evidence links - Add footnote to quality check with EPG source - Substantially enrich guidance.md: principles, 5-step procedure, theory list, hypothesis tips, kooperatives Fallverstehen, full EPG checklist - Improve index.jsonc subtitle and overview
619 B
619 B
| id | type | title | hint | footnote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| analysis-hypothesen-1 | markdown | Konstatierende Hypothesen (Methode 1) | Formuliere konstatierende Hypothesen: Was lässt sich aus der Analyse feststellen? Gehe gedanklich auf eine Metaebene und halte Zentrales, Auffallendes, sich Widersprechendes oder Irritierendes fest. Gewichte die Hypothesen nach Relevanz. Achtung: nur beschreiben, WAS ist – keine Ursachenerklärungen (kein ‹weil›, ‹deshalb›). | 📚 Konstatierende Hypothesen ([Hochuli Freund/Stotz 2021, S. 191](/book/arbeit/191)) — Vogelperspektive und Gewichtung ([Praxis, S. 111](/book/praxis/111)) |