83f5470033
- Reduced text in all EPG guidance boxes to focus only on scoring criteria - Reorganised chapters to follow: EPG → KPG → Other guidance → Einleitungsabsatz → Content → Qualitätsprüfung - Created new KPG guidance boxes for Introduction and Organizational Context - Created new guidance boxes for critical requirements and practical tips - Migrated explanatory content from EPG boxes to dedicated guidance boxes - Updated all EPG boxes to use English for clarity and conciseness - No tables in any guidance boxes
16 lines
643 B
Markdown
16 lines
643 B
Markdown
---
|
|
id: "analysis-epg-guidance"
|
|
type: "guidance-box"
|
|
title: "📋 EPG-Bewertung: Analyse (max. 9 Punkte)"
|
|
variant: "amber"
|
|
footnote: "📋 Scoring criteria for Analysis"
|
|
---
|
|
**Scoring criteria:**
|
|
- Analysis methods: appropriate, justified, well-founded (1.5)
|
|
- Cooperation: differentiated and concrete (1.5)
|
|
- Analysis: relevant and substantive aspects (1.5)
|
|
- Hypotheses: logically derived, correctly formulated, weighted (1.5)
|
|
- Case theme: precise, coherent, foundation for diagnosis (3.0)
|
|
|
|
Use methods such as: genogram, timeline, network map, competence analysis, resource/problem analysis. See Hochuli Freund/Stotz (2021, pp. 200, 207).
|