kpg/2026-001
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
83f5470033
2026-001/050-analysis/01-analysis-epg-guidance.md
KPG Mentor 83f5470033 Shorten EPG guidance boxes and reorganize chapter structure per strict ordering 
- Reduced text in all EPG guidance boxes to focus only on scoring criteria
- Reorganised chapters to follow: EPG → KPG → Other guidance → Einleitungsabsatz → Content → Qualitätsprüfung
- Created new KPG guidance boxes for Introduction and Organizational Context
- Created new guidance boxes for critical requirements and practical tips
- Migrated explanatory content from EPG boxes to dedicated guidance boxes
- Updated all EPG boxes to use English for clarity and conciseness
- No tables in any guidance boxes
2026-03-08 10:01:38 +00:00

643 B
Raw Blame History

id type title variant footnote
analysis-epg-guidance guidance-box 📋 EPG-Bewertung: Analyse (max. 9 Punkte) amber 📋 Scoring criteria for Analysis

Scoring criteria:

  • Analysis methods: appropriate, justified, well-founded (1.5)
  • Cooperation: differentiated and concrete (1.5)
  • Analysis: relevant and substantive aspects (1.5)
  • Hypotheses: logically derived, correctly formulated, weighted (1.5)
  • Case theme: precise, coherent, foundation for diagnosis (3.0)

Use methods such as: genogram, timeline, network map, competence analysis, resource/problem analysis. See Hochuli Freund/Stotz (2021, pp. 200, 207).