2026-001/08-analysis-hypothesen-2.md at b4656fd49d71bceeb1078a9c2f2f38bd8d80c55c - 2026-001 - Gitea: Git with a cup of tea

kpg/2026-001

Csaba Fabian c01f74befc Enrich guidance, hints, footnotes for steps 040–050 with KB evidence

- Fix incorrect book links: praxis/125-126 → arbeit/165,170 (Situationserfassung)
- Fix incorrect book links: praxis/160-161 → arbeit/200,207 (Analyse)
- Fix typo 'Whle' → 'Wähle' in analysis EPG guidance
- Correct EPG max points for Situationserfassung: 9 → 10 (per EPG Ausführungsbestimmungen)
- Update EPG criteria to match exact evidence from page 7-8 of EPG document
- Add footnotes with exact page references to Hochuli Freund/Stotz 2021
- Enrich hints with specific KB terminology and method names
- Add book links to guidance.md files with method tips
- Update Qualitätsprüfung blocks with EPG-aligned criteria and point values

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

2026-03-04 22:26:34 +00:00

9 lines

319 B

Markdown

Raw Blame History

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

 ---
 id: "analysis-hypothesen-2"
 type: "markdown"
 title: "Konstatierende Hypothesen (Methode 2)"
 hint: "Formuliere konstatierende Hypothesen aus der zweiten Analysemethode. Gewichte sie nach Relevanz. Nur feststellen, WAS ist – keine Ursachenerklärungen."
 footnote: "📚 Vgl. Hochuli Freund/Stotz 2021, S. 191"
 ---